1. Organising Secretary, Joint Secretary and Treasurer
Organising Secretary
The Organising Secretary, assisted by the Joint Secretary, shall act on the advice of the Chairman and the Managing Trustee in arranging regular meetings of the Board. He shall maintain and circulate the minutes of such meetings. He shall prepare the agenda for subsequent meetings and circulate the same to all Members of the Trust Board at least seven days in advance. He shall also circulate the minutes of the Board meetings to all Members within one week from the date of each meeting.
Joint Secretary
The Joint Secretary shall assist the Organising Secretary in making arrangements for the meetings of the Board and shall discharge the functions of the Organising Secretary in his absence.
Treasurer
The Treasurer shall be responsible for the proper maintenance and custody of all accounts of the Trust. He shall maintain the ledgers, cash books, vouchers, receipts and all other accounting records, and shall place the accounts periodically before the Managing Trustee and the Board of Trustees at the meetings of the Trust Board.
2. Meetings of the Board of Trustees
a) The Board of Trustees shall meet at least once in every three months or earlier whenever necessary, subject to a minimum of six meetings in a year, for the purpose of reviewing the activities of the Trust and determining its future course of action.
b) The decision of the majority of the Board of Trustees in all matters shall be final and binding upon all Trustees.
c) Quorum – A quorum shall consist of one-half of the total number of Members of the Board as on that date, subject to a minimum of five Members with voting rights. If a quorum is not present, the meeting shall stand adjourned and shall be reconvened at the same venue, on the same day and at the same time of the immediately succeeding week. Intimation regarding the reconvened meeting shall be given by the Organising Secretary on the day of adjournment to all Members of the Board. No quorum shall be required for such adjourned meeting.
d) Minutes – The Organising Secretary shall convene the meetings, record the minutes in a systematic manner in a Minutes Book, submit the same to the Chairman and the Managing Trustee, circulate them to all Members within one week from the date of the meeting and place them for ratification at the next meeting.
e) Casting Vote – In the event of an equality of votes on any question, the Founder Chairman may exercise one additional vote in addition to his own vote, which shall be treated as a casting vote. All questions placed for consideration at any meeting of the Trust Board shall, save where unanimity is expressly required, be decided by a majority of votes.
f) The Board may adopt any urgent resolution by circulation among all the Trustees of the Board and on securing the assent of a majority. Every such resolution shall be placed before the next meeting of the Board for formal ratification.
3. Membership (Paragraph 19)
Any person having strong faith and belief in the objects and activities of the Trust may be admitted as a Life Member on payment of a sum of Rs. 1,116/-, or as a General Member on payment of Rs. 10/-, upon submitting an application in the prescribed form.
The Board of Trustees shall have absolute discretion to accept or reject any application for membership and the decision of the Board in this regard shall be final. No applicant or Member shall have any right or claim over admission to membership.
A Member shall not have the right to nominate any successor or representative to attend the annual general body meetings. Such Members shall have no right to interfere with or participate in the day-to-day administration of the Trust. They shall not possess voting rights.
If any Life Member or General Member is found to be engaging in activities prejudicial or detrimental to the aims, objects or interests of the Trust, the Board may issue a notice calling for his explanation within one calendar month from the date of receipt of such notice. If the reply is unsatisfactory, or if the Member refuses to accept the notice or fails to reply, the Board may, by resolution, expel such Member or take such other action as it deems appropriate.
Life Members who have substantially contributed to the development of the Trust in its initial stages may, in preference to others, be nominated as the representatives of the Trust on the governing councils or boards of committees, institutions, organisations or affiliates associated with the Trust.
4. Appointment of Manager and Staff (Paragraph 20)
The Board may appoint a Manager and such other staff as may be required, upon such remuneration and upon such terms and conditions as may, from time to time, be determined by the Board.
5. Tenure and Powers of Trustees (New Paragraphs 15–17 etc.)
Paragraph 15 – Tenure of Founder Trustees
The tenure of the Founder Trustees shall be for life, save and except in the circumstances specified in Paragraph 14 (death, resignation, insanity/serious illness, insolvency, or expulsion for conduct detrimental to the Trust). Upon any vacancy arising among the Founder Trustees, the Board of Trustees shall nominate any suitable member of DFI as a Life Trustee to fill such vacancy.
Paragraph 16 – Re-nomination of Trustees
The Board shall have the power to re-nominate any retiring Trustee for any number of further terms.
Paragraph 17 – Founder Chairman and Managing Trustee
The Founder Chairman shall hold the office of Managing Trustee/General Secretary for life. Subsequent Managing Trustees shall be nominated by the Board of Trustees from among the Permanent Trustees. The Board of Trustees, consisting at any given time of a minimum of eleven Members, shall elect from among themselves the following office-bearers:
Chairman
Vice-Chairman
Organising Secretary
Joint Secretary
Treasurer
Paragraph 18 – Duties of the Trust Board (summary)
The Trust Board shall have such powers and functions as are necessary to manage, administer and supervise all affairs, properties, finances and activities of the Trust in accordance with this Deed and with applicable law. (All detailed functions of the Board and of the office-bearers are as drafted in your main deed – already polished in the previous reply.)
6. Clarificatory / Amendment-Type Clauses in the Images
A number of the scan snippets describe technical amendments (renumbering paragraphs, inserting new sub-paragraphs, replacing words like “President” with “Managing Trustee/General Secretary”, etc.). In high-end English, their substantive effect can be captured as:
Wherever the designation “President” occurs, it shall stand substituted by “Managing Trustee/General Secretary”, and wherever appropriate by “Managing Trustee”.
Certain clauses are renumbered without altering substance (for example, former paragraph 25 becomes paragraph 26; former paragraph 26 becomes paragraph 27, etc.) so that the sequence of clauses relating to Finance, Bank Accounts, Investments, Expenditure, Financial Year, Affiliation, Dissolution, Tenure of Permanent/Life Trustees and Accounting Year runs coherently from paragraph 29 onward.
In the clauses dealing with:
Committees and Sub-committees (sub-paragraph o) – it is expressly added that committee and sub-committee members shall hold office in an honorary capacity but shall be entitled to reimbursement of actual travelling and incidental expenses incurred for attending meetings and for carrying out the objects of the Trust.
Sub-paragraph p – it is clarified that the work undertaken shall be “for the expedient and efficient management” of the Trust.
Sub-paragraph v – the Board is expressly empowered to open additional Chapters of the Foundation in other Districts, other States in India and abroad for the further propagation of the objects of the Foundation.
The indemnity and liability clauses are clarified to state that:
Trustees are indemnified out of the Trust funds against all losses or expenses incurred in the discharge of their duties, except where such loss is caused by their own wilful neglect, negligence or dishonesty.
Trustees shall not be personally liable for loss to the Trust fund unless found guilty of fraud or criminal breach of trust by a competent court of law, and any such liability shall not extend to their private assets.
The resignation clause is refined to provide that:
Any Trustee may resign from office by giving one month’s written notice to the Chairman/Managing Trustee and obtaining a written order of acceptance and relieving from the Board; and
The Board retains the power to take action against any outgoing Trustee for misappropriation or acts detrimental to the Trust’s aims and objects committed during his tenure, even after his resignation and relieving order.
The Saving Clause is restated (Paragraph 34) as:
“In respect of any matters on which this Trust Deed is silent, the provisions of the Indian Trusts Act shall apply.”
✅ A. CLAUSES THAT DESTROY KAMALAKAR’S AUTHORITY TO DO FRAUD
1. Misuse of Trust & Criminal Breach
Clause 25(b) — Trustees shall not be liable except when found guilty of fraud or criminal breach of trust by a competent court.
➡ Argument:
“My Lords, the Trust Deed itself recognises that a Trustee becomes personally liable where he is guilty of fraud or criminal breach. The magnitude of misappropriation demonstrated here squarely attracts this clause. The Chairman’s personal liability is inherent in the Trust instrument itself.”
2. Kamalakar has NO POWER to dispose immovable property without donor approval
Clause 24(b) — Disposing of Trust land/buildings requires approval of majority of land donors.
➡ Argument:
“My Lords, any sale, promise of sale, collection of land money, alignment of plots or real estate promotions without donor-majority consent is illegal and void. The accused Chairman violated this mandatory condition and acted ultra vires the Trust.”
3. The Trust cannot be used for commercial real estate activity
Multiple clauses explicitly state that:
Trust is charitable,
Funds must be used for public charitable objects,
Trustees must follow Income Tax Act s.11 & s.12 (public trust framework).
➡ Argument:
“My Lords, running layout schemes, collecting crores, promising plots and commercial returns is wholly alien to a Public Charitable Trust. This is a textbook case of diversion of charitable structure for personal enrichment.”
✅ B. CLAUSES SHOWING VIOLATION OF GOVERNANCE & BOARD STRUCTURE
4. Board must meet minimum 6 times a year; none were conducted
Clause II(a) — Minimum six meetings per year.
➡ Argument:
“My Lords, the Chairman never conducted lawful Board meetings. Every activity was unilateral. This is a structural illegality which vitiates every decision purportedly made.”
5. Quorum requirement violated
Clause II(c) — Quorum is ½ of total members, minimum 5.
➡ Argument:
“No real quorum was ever constituted. The entire administration was single-handed. Such unilateral administration is in direct contravention of mandatory quorum rules.”
6. Minutes must be circulated within one week; never done
Clause II(d)
➡ Argument:
“My Lords, the Trust Deed requires written minutes circulated within one week. There is not a single properly recorded or circulated minute for decades. This confirms clandestine operations.”
7. Urgent resolutions must be ratified; never ratified
Clause II(f)
➡ Argument:
“Even urgent resolutions require majority assent and later ratification. The accused Chairman took decisions without assent or ratification. All actions are void.”
✅ C. CLAUSES PROVING FINANCIAL MISCONDUCT
8. Treasurer must maintain books; no books exist
Treasurer Clause — Ledger, vouchers, receipts must be periodically submitted.
➡ Argument:
“There is not a single properly maintained ledger or voucher. This amounts to deliberate destruction or non-maintenance of mandatory statutory records.”
9. All funds must be deposited in approved bank accounts
Finance Clause 29(b)
➡ Argument:
“My Lords, crores of rupees collected in cash, unauthorised accounts and benami accounts is direct violation. Trust law requires deposits only in scheduled banks in the Trust’s name.”
10. Investments only in Government securities or approved modes
Clause on Investments – IT Act 11(5)
➡ Argument:
“The accused diverted Trust funds into private ventures and land schemes. This is expressly prohibited by law and by this Trust Deed.”
✅ D. CLAUSES PROVING ABUSE OF POWER & BREACH OF DUTY
11. Trustees are only honorary; cannot take commissions or personal benefit
Sub-clause (l)
➡ Argument:
“My Lords, the Chairman took crores in the name of layouts, advances and investments. Trusteeship is honorary. Any personal gain is per se misconduct.”
12. Trustees may be expelled for acting detrimental to objects
Amended Paragraph 14(e)
➡ Argument:
“The Trust Deed authorises expulsion where a Trustee acts detrimental to the Trust. Here the Chairman’s conduct is not only detrimental but destructive, warranting immediate removal and criminal sanctions.”
13. Trustees remain liable even after resignation
Clause 25(c)
➡ Argument:
“Even if the accused relies on resignation or retirement, the Deed states he remains answerable for misappropriation during his tenure. He cannot escape liability.”
✅ E. CLAUSES PROVING ILLEGAL USE OF TRUST STRUCTURE FOR SCAMS
14. No Trustee may act without Board approval
Sub-clause (q) — All administrative matters must be decided by Board; decision final.
➡ Argument:
“Here no Board approval exists for layouts, investments or collections. Every act is ultra vires.”
15. Committees and sub-committees must be appointed by Board
Sub-clause (o)
➡ Argument:
“No committee was ever validly formed. Everything was done via personal agents and marketing teams, in total breach of the Deed.”
16. Alteration of objects requires prior approval of Commissioner of Income Tax
Clause 27
➡ Argument:
“Transforming a charitable medical trust into a real estate venture is an alteration of objects, which requires mandatory prior approval of CIT. No approval exists. Hence all such activities are illegal.”
✅ F. ARGUMENTS TO CANCEL BAIL / OPPose Stay
Based entirely on Trust Deed clauses:
17. Continuing Offence After Bail
Trustees must maintain books, minutes, accounts and transparency — none exist.
➡ Argument:
“My Lords, the accused continues to violate every clause of the Trust Deed, even after bail. This establishes a continuing offence and justifies cancellation of bail.”
18. Misuse of Trust Seal, Trust Name and Trust Members is a fraud on the Trust
➡ Argument:
“Every collection, receipt and promise made in the name of the Trust, without legality, constitutes repeated fraudulent acts. Granting stay would protect ongoing illegality.”
19. Public at large and elderly donors were induced in the name of Trust
➡ Argument:
“The Trust was weaponised as a shield to cheat thousands of elderly donors. This violates public trust principles and demands strict judicial intervention.”
20. The Trust Deed itself makes the Chairman personally liable
➡ Argument:
“When the governing instrument explicitly imposes liability for fraud, the Court must treat this as aggravating factor, not as mere civil irregularity.”
AFFIDAVIT UNDER SECTION 340 Cr.P.C.
(For initiating prosecution for perjury, forgery, fabrication, criminal breach of trust and deliberate misleading of the Hon’ble Court)
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
Crl.A. Nos. 1040 to 1047 of 2025
I.A. No. ____ of 2025
(Under Section 340 Cr.P.C.)
Between:
[Name of the Petitioner / Trust / VRPT] … Applicant / Petitioner
And
Dr. Pantangi Kamalakar Sharma & Others … Proposed Accused / Respondents
AFFIDAVIT FILED BY THE APPLICANT UNDER SECTION 340 Cr.P.C.
I, ___________________________, S/o ____________________, Aged ___ years, presently functioning as ______________________ in the Victims’ Rights Protection Trust (VRPT), having office at ____________________________, do hereby solemnly affirm and state as follows:
1. Purpose of This Application
I am filing this Affidavit under Section 340 Cr.P.C. seeking initiation of criminal proceedings against Dr. Pantangi Kamalakar Sharma, Chairperson of Dhanwanti Foundation International (DFI), and his associates, for having:
deliberately given false evidence before Courts;
knowingly filed false affidavits;
fabricated, manipulated and forged records;
suppressed material documents;
misrepresented the Trust structure;
diverted Trust funds;
violated mandatory clauses of the Trust Deed; and
misused judicial proceedings to perpetuate fraud.
These acts constitute offences punishable under:
Sections 191, 192, 193 IPC (perjury and giving false evidence),
Sections 463, 464, 468, 471 IPC (forgery and use of forged documents),
Sections 405, 409 IPC (criminal breach of trust),
Section 477A IPC (falsification of accounts),
and other allied provisions.
2. Material Falsehoods and Perjury Committed Before the Court
The accused has repeatedly misrepresented himself as sole authorised Trustee, whereas the Trust Deed mandates collective administration, minimum six meetings annually, quorum requirements, and majority-based decisions.
The accused has filed false statements before the MSJ Court and this Hon’ble Court claiming:
that all Trust activities were duly approved;
that accounts were regularly maintained;
that permissions existed for layout development;
that donor approvals for land transactions were obtained;
that the Trust was empowered to conduct real-estate schemes.
These statements are demonstrably false and contradict the mandatory clauses of the Trust Deed.
3. Violations of Trust Deed – Proof of Fraud & Breach of Trust
Clause 24(b) specifically prohibits the disposal of Trust immovable properties without approval of majority of land/building donors. No such approval was ever taken. Still, thousands of crores were collected in the name of layouts.
Clause II(a) mandates minimum six Board Meetings per year. No legally valid meetings were held for decades.
Clause II(c) mandates quorum of at least five voting Trustees. Not a single act of the accused satisfies the quorum requirement.
Clause II(d) mandates circulation of minutes within a week. No such minutes exist.
Clause 29(b) mandates that all funds be deposited in scheduled/nationalised bank accounts in the name of the Trust. Vast funds were collected in cash and in benami/personal accounts of the accused, constituting criminal breach of trust.
Clause l states Trustees hold office in honorary capacity and cannot receive any commission or monetary gain. Yet the accused enriched himself through land fraud, investments and unauthorised collections.
Clause 27 mandates prior approval of the Commissioner of Income Tax before any alteration of Trust objects. Running layout schemes and commercial real estate projects constitutes alteration of Trust objects without legal sanction.
These repeated violations prove intent to defraud the public and misuse of the Trust structure.
4. Forgery and Fabrication of Documents
The accused has produced:
fake meeting minutes,
fabricated donor consent lists,
forged plots/layout approvals,
forged receipts and financial records,
doctored authorisation letters,
manipulated membership registers.
These documents bear hallmarks of fabrication, including:
inconsistent signatures,
impossible dates,
non-existent Trustees,
mismatch of numbering,
absence of original minutes registers.
The deliberate use of forged documents before a judicial forum attracts Sections 191–193 & Sections 463–471 IPC, and thus mandates initiation under Section 340 Cr.P.C.
5. Suppression of Material Documents
The accused deliberately withheld:
audited financial statements,
ledger books,
bank statements of the Trust,
original donor lists,
original membership records,
actual minutes of Board meetings,
details of approval under Income Tax Act,
communications with land donors.
This suppression is intended to mislead the Court and obstruct justice, thereby attracting Section 195(1)(b) Cr.P.C. and requiring prosecution through Section 340.
6. Need for Inquiry by This Hon’ble Court
As the perjury and forgery were committed during judicial proceedings, this Hon’ble Court alone is empowered under Section 340 Cr.P.C. to order an enquiry.
The acts complained of are not mere irregularities but deliberate, calculated and fraudulent misrepresentations intended to:
mislead the Court,
delay criminal proceedings,
obtain favourable orders including bail and stay,
defeat the rights of thousands of victims.
The standard laid down by the Supreme Court in Iqbal Singh Marwah v. Meenakshi Marwah squarely applies:
“Wherever falsehood affects administration of justice, prosecution under Section 340 is mandatory.”
7. Prayer
In view of the above, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to:
a) Order an inquiry under Section 340 Cr.P.C. against Dr. Pantangi Kamalakar Sharma and associates for offences punishable under Sections 191–193, 196, 199, 200, 463–471, 405, 409, 420, 477A IPC, and other allied offences.
b) Direct the Registrar (Judicial) of this Hon’ble Court or any competent authority to conduct the inquiry and lodge a criminal complaint before the jurisdictional Magistrate.
c) Pass such other orders as may be deemed fit and proper in the interest of justice.
Verification
I, ______________________, the above-named deponent, do hereby verify that the contents of this affidavit are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Verified on this ___ day of __________, 2025 at Hyderabad.
Deponent
(Signature)
**COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF THE TRUST DEED AND VIOLATIONS
BY DR. PANTANGI KAMALAKAR SHARMA — HIGH-END ENGLISH VERSION**
This note explains what the Trust Deed mandates, and how Dr. Kamalakar Sharma systematically violated each clause, engaged in fraudulent activities, fabricated documents, misled Courts and Investigating Agencies, and misused the Trust’s name and logo for large-scale cheating.
1. The Nature and Purpose of the Trust — What the Deed Mandates
Trust Deed Requirements
The Deed creates a Public Charitable Trust, exclusively for:
Healthcare,
Education,
Assisting the needy,
Medical relief,
Scholarships,
Social welfare,
Non-profit philanthropic work.
The Trust is not empowered to:
Buy, sell, promote or market real estate,
Collect investments promising returns,
Conduct commercial ventures,
Run profit-oriented schemes.
Violation by Kamalakar
Dr. Kamalakar Sharma converted a charitable trust into a full-fledged private real estate enterprise, by:
Launching multiple “DFI Layouts,” “DFI Townships,” “Agraharams,” and “Campuses,”
Collecting crores of rupees from elderly persons, NRIs, doctors, and Brahmin community members,
Promising plots, returns, profit-shares, campus facilities, and future benefits—none of which fall under Trust objects.
Legal Consequence
This conduct constitutes:
Criminal Breach of Trust — Sections 405 & 409 IPC,
Cheating — Sections 415 & 420 IPC,
Violation of the Trust’s fundamental purpose, rendering all such activities illegal and ultra vires.
2. Administration of the Trust — Mandated Collective Governance
Trust Deed Requirements
Five Founder Trustees form the First Board, tenure life-long, decisions must be collective.
All administrative powers vest in the Board, not in any individual.
Chairman, Vice-Chairman, Managing Trustee, Secretary, Treasurer must function institutionally.
Violation by Kamalakar
Reduced the entire Trust into a one-man proprietary venture, functioning without authority.
Did not consult or involve the other Founder Trustees.
Prevented access to Trust records, bank accounts, minutes, resolutions.
Represented himself as “Founder Chairman & Sole Decision Maker” everywhere — contrary to the Deed.
Legal Consequence
He usurped powers not vested in him, amounting to:
Abuse of fiduciary position — Section 409 IPC,
Dishonest misappropriation — Section 403 IPC,
Perjury when he claimed before Courts that he had full authorization — Sections 191–193 IPC.
3. Board Meetings, Quorum, Minutes — Mandatory Legal Structure
Trust Deed Requirements
Minimum six Board Meetings every year.
Quorum: Not less than five Trustees with voting rights.
Minutes must be circulated within one week.
No decision is valid without quorum.
Violation by Kamalakar
No legitimate Board Meeting conducted for decades.
Whenever scrutiny began, he fabricated minutes, with impossible dates, mismatching signatures and back-dated resolutions.
Showed Trustees as “present” who were:
outside India,
deceased,
or not contacted at all.
Legal Consequence
Forgery — Sections 463, 464, 468 IPC,
Use of forged documents — Section 471 IPC,
Perjury before Court & CCS — Sections 191–193 IPC.
4. Disposal of Immovable Property — Strict Donor Consent Requirement
Trust Deed Requirements (Clause 24(b))
Immovable property of the Trust cannot be sold, exchanged, or encumbered unless:
the majority of land/building donors give written approval,
the Board of Trustees passes a valid resolution.
Violation by Kamalakar
Collected crores for:
“DFI Agraharam layouts,”
“Midjil Campus plots,”
“DFI Brahmin Township,” etc.
Not a SINGLE donor approval exists.
Not a SINGLE valid Board resolution exists.
He issued fake plot allotment letters, fake master plans, and unapproved layouts.
Legal Consequence
Criminal breach of trust — Section 409 IPC,
Cheating — Section 420 IPC,
Forgery of approvals — Sections 468, 471 IPC.
5. Bank Accounts, Receipts, Audits — Mandatory Transparency
Trust Deed Requirements
All donations and collections must be deposited only in:
Scheduled / Nationalised Bank Accounts in the Trust’s name.
Annual accounts must be:
properly maintained,
audited by a Chartered Accountant,
approved by the Board.
Violation by Kamalakar
Collected money:
in personal bank accounts,
accounts of family members,
cash collections without vouchers,
benami accounts.
No genuine cash books, ledgers, or audit reports exist.
Fake receipts were printed with Trust logo but money never reached Trust accounts.
Legal Consequence
Falsification of accounts — Section 477A IPC,
Misappropriation — Section 403 IPC,
Cheating & Criminal breach of trust — Sections 405, 409 IPC.
6. Trustees Are Honorary — No Personal Gains Permitted
Trust Deed Requirements
Trustees cannot personally:
take commission,
take brokerage,
take “service charges,”
take “development charges,”
take profit or salary.
Violation by Kamalakar
Personally collected huge sums under:
“campus development charges,”
“special donation,”
“plot registration advance,”
“VIP contribution fee,”
“township membership.”
All such amounts went directly to him or through his inner circle.
Legal Consequence
Criminal breach of trust — Section 409 IPC,
Dishonest inducement — Section 420 IPC.
7. Amendment of Objects — Requires Income Tax Department Approval
Trust Deed Requirements (Clause 27)
Objects cannot be altered without:
prior written sanction from the Commissioner of Income Tax.
Violation
Expanded the Trust from charitable activities into:
land development,
real estate business,
mass investments,
plot allotments.
No IT Department approval for any such change of purpose.
Legal Consequence
All activities are illegal, void and fraudulent,
Claims made before Court as “authorised Trust activities” are false evidence under Section 193 IPC.
8. Misuse of Trust Name, Logo and Legal Identity
Nature of Fraud
The Trust name “Dhanwantari Foundation International” and its logo were used:
on brochures,
on receipts,
on advertisements,
on visiting cards,
on plot allotment letters,
on fake Township plans.
Victims trusted the Trust name, not the individual.
Legal Consequence
This constitutes:
Cheating by impersonation — Section 419 IPC,
Cheating by using Trust’s legal identity — Section 420 IPC,
Forgery of seals/logos — Section 467 IPC,
Use of forged documents — Section 471 IPC.
9. False Representations Before Courts, CCS and Authorities
Examples of False Statements
“All Trustees approved the layouts.”
“Trust accounts are audited and transparent.”
“There is no fraud; it is only a civil dispute.”
“Victims are only donors or members, not allottees.”
“Layouts are legally approved by competent authorities.”
All of these were false, and intended to mislead:
MSJ Court,
High Court,
CCS Hyderabad,
Various police stations.
Legal Consequence
Perjury — Sections 191, 192, 193 IPC,
Fabrication of evidence — Section 192 IPC,
Obstruction of justice, inviting action under Section 340 CrPC.
10. Role of VRPT & GPS Giri Prasad Sharma
The Victims’ Rights Protection Trust (VRPT) thoroughly examined the original 2004 Trust Deed and amendments.
VRPT exposed each violation:
misuse of Trust structure,
diversion of funds,
cheating of elderly persons,
fake Board resolutions,
forged papers shown to authorities.
Thousands of victims subsequently approached GPS Giri Prasad Sharma, recognising that VRPT was the only organisation exposing the fraud clause-by-clause, with complete transparency and legal accuracy.
CONCLUSION — TRUST DEED VS FRAUD
Trust Deed = Charitable Organisation
Kamalakar Sharma = Real Estate Scammer Misusing Charity Cover
He violated every foundational clause:
Purpose,
Governance,
Accounts,
Donor approval,
Meetings,
Amendments,
Transparency,
Fiduciary duties.
This makes the entire scheme a textbook criminal conspiracy, attracting:
Sections 409, 420, 468, 471, 477A, 193 IPC,
And prosecution under Section 340 CrPC for perjury in Court.